View Full Version: Battlefleet Cards

Duelist HQ > Yu-Gi-Oh! Fantasy Card Discussion > Battlefleet Cards



Title: Battlefleet Cards


Flame Champion - September 17, 2007 05:16 PM (GMT)
BattleFleet - Scout Starship
****
Machine/Light
1300/1200
This card cannot be special summoned. Discard one card from your hand to destroy one face up card on the field. This effect can only be used once per turn.

BattleFleet - Artillery Starship
****
Machine/Fire
500/1800
This card cannot be special summoned. Discard one card from your hand to the graveyard to inflict 1000 points of damage to your opponent's lifepoints. This effect can only be used once per turn.

BattleFleet - Spectral Starship
***
Machine/Water
600/200
This card cannot be special summoned. This card can attack your opponent's lifepoints directly. Every time this card inflicts battle damage to your opponent's lifepoints, draw one card.

ChaosCommandMagician - September 17, 2007 09:13 PM (GMT)
Not too bad. But I think you mis-worded Battlefleet Protocol.

Sanctity - September 18, 2007 03:30 AM (GMT)
Spec and Scout are hawt.

Vincent K - September 18, 2007 04:19 AM (GMT)
Let's see...you know, it could go either way with the term "summoning conditions". Like...the summoning condition for Armed Dragon Lv. 7 is that it cannot be Normal Summoned or Set, and it cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of Armed Dragon Lv. 5.

However, rulings for Level Modulation show that the monster must have been properly summoned first to be brought back by the effect of Level Modulation's effect.

But there is no proper way to Special Summon a card that cannot be Special Summoned.

However, I'd say it is safe to define a card's summoning conditions on if and how it can be Normal Summoned/Set/Special Summoned. So because BattleFleet Protocol ignores those conditions, and BattleFleet monster becomes a legal target.

So, BattleFleet Protocol is worded correctly in that sense. I would have worded the second part differently, but the effect still makes sense when written the way FC has it.

ChaosCommandMagician - September 18, 2007 12:09 PM (GMT)
Actually, I was referring to the last sentence on Protocol.

This card gains 1000 ATK and is destroyed during the end phase of the turn this card is act6ivated.

Under that wording, it'd imply that the spell card itself gains the ATK points, and not the monster. I knew what he meant, but that was what I was referring to by the mis-wording.

Flame Champion - September 18, 2007 02:59 PM (GMT)
so went in to edit my cards, and when i clicked save changes it deleted half of my post. lol.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree